The methods and procedures in this Standard are intended to supplement and augment the requirements in API 510, API 570, API 653, and other post construction codes that reference Fitness-For-Service (FFS) evaluations such as NB-23.1.2.2 The assessment procedures in this Standard can be used for Fitness-For-Service assessments and/or rerating of equipment designed and constructed to the following codes:
a) ASME B&PV Code, Section VIII, Division 1b) ASME B&PV Code, Section VIII, Division 2c) ASME B&PV Code, Section Id) ASME B31.1 Piping Codee) ASME B31.3 Piping Codef) API 650g) API 620
1.2.3 The assessment procedures in this Standard may also be applied to pressure containing equipment constructed to other recognized codes and standards, including international and internal corporate standards. This Standard has broad application since the assessment procedures are based on allowable stress methods and plastic collapse loads for non-crack-like flaws, and the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Approach for crack-like flaws.
a) If the procedures of this Standard are applied to pressure containing equipment not constructed to the codes listed in paragraph 1.2.2, then the user is advised to first review the validation discussion in Annex H. The information in Annex H, along with knowledge of the differences in design codes, should enable the user to factor, scale, or adjust the acceptance limits of this Standard such that equivalent FFS inservice margins can be attained for equipment not constructed to these codes. When evaluating other codes and standards the following attributes of the ASME and API design codes should be considered:1) Material specifications2) Upper and/or lower temperature limits for specific materials3) Material strength properties and the design allowable stress basis4) Material fracture toughness requirements5) Design rules for shell sections6) Design rules for shell discontinuities such as nozzles and conical transitions7) Design requirements for cyclic loads8) Design requirements for operation in the creep range9) Weld joint efficiency or quality factors10) Fabrication details and quality of workmanship11) Inspection requirements, particularly for welded joints
b) As an alternative, users may elect to correlate the pressure-containing component's material specification to an equivalent ASME or API listed material specification to determine a comparable allowable stress. This approach provides an entry point into the ASME or API codes (refer also to Annex A) wherein the pressure-containing component is reconciled or generally made equivalent to the design bases assumed for this Standard. Hence, general equivalence is established and the user may then directly apply the acceptance limits of the Fitness-For-Service procedures contained in this Standard. Equivalent ASME and ASTM material specifications provide a satisfactory means for initiating reconciliation between the ASME and API design codes and other codes and standards. However, the user is cautioned to also consider the effects of fabrication and inspection requirements on the design basis (e.g., joint efficiency with respect to minimum thickness calculation).
1.2.4 The Fitness-For-Service assessment procedures in this Standard cover both the present integrity of the component given a current state of damage and the projected remaining life. Assessment techniques are included to evaluate flaws including: general and localized corrosion, widespread and localized pitting, blisters and hydrogen damage, weld misalignment and shell distortions, crack-like flaws including environmental cracking, laminations, dents and gouges, and remaining life assessment procedures for components operating in the creep range. In addition, evaluation techniques are provided for condition assessment of equipment including resistance to brittle fracture, long-term creep damage, and fire damage.1.2.5 Analytical procedures, material properties including environmental effects, NDE guidelines and documentation requirements are included in the Fitness-For-Service assessment procedures in this Standard. In addition, both qualitative and quantitative guidance for establishing remaining life and in-service margins for continued operation of equipment are provided in regards to future operating conditions and environmental compatibility.1.2.6 The Fitness-For-Service assessment procedures in this Standard can be used to evaluate flaws commonly encountered in pressure vessels, piping and tankage. The procedures are not intended to provide a definitive guideline for every possible situation that may be encountered. However, flexibility is provided to the user in the form of an advanced assessment level to handle uncommon situations that may require a more detailed analysis.
